Skip to content
项目
群组
代码片段
帮助
正在加载...
登录
切换导航
F
freeswitch
项目
项目
详情
活动
周期分析
仓库
仓库
文件
提交
分支
标签
贡献者
分枝图
比较
统计图
议题
0
议题
0
列表
看板
标记
里程碑
合并请求
0
合并请求
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
流水线
作业
日程
统计图
Wiki
Wiki
代码片段
代码片段
成员
成员
折叠边栏
关闭边栏
活动
分枝图
统计图
创建新议题
作业
提交
议题看板
打开侧边栏
张华
freeswitch
Commits
6ab5e85f
提交
6ab5e85f
authored
6月 18, 2014
作者:
Brian West
浏览文件
操作
浏览文件
下载
差异文件
Merge branch 'master' of
ssh://git.freeswitch.org/freeswitch
上级
31188963
723ea008
隐藏空白字符变更
内嵌
并排
正在显示
1 个修改的文件
包含
22 行增加
和
0 行删除
+22
-0
README.IPv6
src/mod/endpoints/mod_skinny/README.IPv6
+22
-0
没有找到文件。
src/mod/endpoints/mod_skinny/README.IPv6
0 → 100644
浏览文件 @
6ab5e85f
mod_skinny currently is not believed to support IPv6 (as of 2014-06-17)
There is a notation in the wiki that you can force IPv6 usage
by setting: ip="::" in the profile, but unclear if that is sufficient
for the rest of the protocol.
According to Cisco documentation, the underlying protocol does support IPv6 for the "G" series
phones. (Basically a subset of the models running the java based image.)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-version-70/112997-cucmipv6-00.html
7906G, 7911G, 7931G, 7942G, 7945G, 7962G, 7965G, and the 7975G
It is possible that others would be supported, and are just not listed in the Cisco documentation
due to them being past end-of-life.
Additional changes will be required to mod_skinny to actually support IPv6, at a bare minimum, the
current code has at least one data structure for the server response that contains a fixed
layout structure with uint32_t's for IP addresses.
If someone has an existing CCM deployment that is using IPv6, sample network captures would be
appreciated.
\ No newline at end of file
编写
预览
Markdown
格式
0%
重试
或
添加新文件
添加附件
取消
您添加了
0
人
到此讨论。请谨慎行事。
请先完成此评论的编辑!
取消
请
注册
或者
登录
后发表评论