- 16 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
I found a problem here but it may not completely match your expectations. I reviewed the RFC 4028 and checked against the code and I discovered we should not be putting a Min-SE in any response at all besides a 422: section 5: The Min-SE header field MUST NOT be used in responses except for those with a 422 response code. It indicates the minimum value of the session interval that the server is willing to accept. I corrected this problem and implemented the 422 response so if you request a value lower than the minimum specified for the profile. If the value is equal or higher to the minimum, it will be reflected in the Session-Expires header in the response and no Min-SE will be present.
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
FS-5997 regression from commit 70accd9f this caused some attended transfers to calls with multiple targets to get the abondoned channels to be stuck on write lock
-
由 William King 提交于
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
add generic keepalive system and implement it in sofia to send MESSAGE or INFO packets in-dialog at specified interval. Adds app: enable_keepalive 0|<seconds> This app can be run in the dialplan or with execute_on_* type variables for B-legs. Adds sofia param: keepalive-method : defaults to MESSAGE can also be "INFO" This param sets which SIP method to use.
-
- 15 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Rienzo 提交于
-
由 Raymond Chandler 提交于
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
-
- 14 4月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Neulinger 提交于
-
由 Nathan Neulinger 提交于
-
由 Chris Rienzo 提交于
-
由 Chris Rienzo 提交于
FS-6447 --resolve return subscriber-absent platform-code 20 if <dial> is attempted to user that is not registered
-
由 Michael Jerris 提交于
-
- 13 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Olsson 提交于
Upgrade to OpenSSL 1.0.1g in Windows build (Visual Studio 2010 and 2012)
-
- 12 4月, 2014 7 次提交
-
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
Automated leak detectors find leaked memory on shutdown. Cleaning up after ourselves on shutdown eliminates noise from these reports.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
The rc variable here was always initialized but the compiler couldn't see that because of the lack of an unconditional else clause.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
We were leaking one event (~539 bytes) for every subscribe packet received with both an "event: as-feature-event" and an authorization header.
-
- 11 4月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
FS-353
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
-
由 James Le Cuirot 提交于
Tested with several libmemcached versions between 0.31 and 1.0.18. Unfortunately the API is extremely volatile and awkward to use. Packaging scripts still need addressing. FS-353
-
由 James Le Cuirot 提交于
Per the automake manual these should go in LIBADD. http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Program-and-Library-Variables.html FS-353 Signed-off-by:
Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
-
由 James Le Cuirot 提交于
FS-353 Signed-off-by:
Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
-
由 Peter Olsson 提交于
-
- 10 4月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
-
由 Anthony Minessale 提交于
-
由 Chris Rienzo 提交于
-
- 09 4月, 2014 9 次提交
-
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
The net effect here is the code looks more "regular" and reads more linearly.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
Previously we would continue considering phrase actions even after receiving a break action; we would only break on the next input clause. It appears the intent here was to break before the next action.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
If we get SWITCH_STATUS_BREAK then we didn't get SWITCH_STATUS_SUCCESS.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
We're breaking out of the loop here anyway, so setting done to true is useless.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
We were leaking memory when break_on_match was set or when we received back SWITCH_STATUS_BREAK from a callee as we were failing to free field_expanded_alloc.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
If pattern is null we're setting it to a non-null value, so this branch will always be taken. Use `git diff -w` or `git log -p -w` to see what's going on in this commit.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
In the event of a memory error, we were trying to free a null pointer while leaking the allocation for field_expanded_alloc.
-
由 Travis Cross 提交于
These variables aren't used outside of this for loop, so they should be declared within it.
-